Challenging Apple's Top 100 Albums Using MaxDiff Music Research

What is the best album of all time? Is it Michael Jackson's "Thriller"? Perhaps it's The Beatles' "Abbey Road"? Or maybe it's Lauryn Hill's "The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill"? When Apple released its list of the 100 Best Albums, music enthusiasts and research experts worldwide found themselves locked in a heated debate. The company had brought together a team of industry professionals to create what they intended to be a definitive ranking of albums that shaped music history. However, the list failed to resonate with many music lovers.

When Apple’s album rankings confused consumers, PureSpectrum saw an opportunity for deeper exploration. They turned to us at Numerious, experts in advanced quantitative research methods, with a unique challenge: find the real gap between professional music critics and everyday listeners.

Our mission? To amplify the voices of music fans and create the ultimate "People’s Playlist," a collection that celebrates the most influential albums of all time—through the lens of the audience that matters most.

How we do music research

To uncover these insights, our research team used a sophisticated technique called MaxDiff (Maximum Difference Scaling) analysis. This method allows us to quantify preferences by presenting participants with multiple subsets of options, in this case, albums, and asking them to identify the best and worst alternatives, or in this case, the albums that most and least shaped the world music lovers live and listen in. By forcing this trade-off, we are able to more accurately measure the preference for each album, providing a clearer picture of what truly resonates with music fans.

Example Survey Screen

The study surveyed 1,500 U.S. participants aged 18 and above from PureSpectrum’s panel. The researchers paid close attention to balancing representation across age, gender, region, and income so as to not skew the results. Before the main ranking exercise, participants had to prove they were active music listeners. An impressive 93% of respondents met this qualification.

Participants were then asked to indicate which of Apple's top 100 albums they recognized, ensuring that only familiar albums were rated. In the main part of the study, participants compared sets of five albums at a time, choosing the most and least influential from each group. To wrap up, the survey included an open-ended section where respondents could suggest additional albums they believed deserved inclusion.

Key findings from music research

The study revealed striking differences between Apple's expert rankings and public opinion. The most dramatic shift involved "The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill," which Apple ranked as most influential (no.1), but dropped to no. 60 in the public ranking. Kendrick Lamar's "Good kid, m.A.A.d city (Deluxe)" also took a tumble, from no. 7 to no. 53.  And one of my personal favorites, Daft Punk’s “Discovery” dropped from no. 23 to no. 75.  

Conversely, other albums made significant improvements under public review. Elton John's "Goodbye Yellow Brick Road (Remastered)" made an impressive climb from no. 78 to no. 2. The Rolling Stones' "Exile on Main Street (2010 Re-Mastered)" rose from no. 53 to no. 6. Madonna's "Like a Prayer" jumped from no. 77 to no. 7, and AC/DC's "Back in Black" moved up from no. 90 to no. 16.

Not all albums saw major changes though. Some maintained consistent rankings across both lists, highlighting their universal appeal. Michael Jackson's "Thriller" held steady, moving from no. 2 on Apple's list to no. 1 on the People's Playlist. The Beatles' "Abbey Road" remained at no. 3, and Prince's "Purple Rain" stayed at no. 4. These consistent rankings suggest these albums have a timeless influence that resonates across different listener groups.

Demographic considerations in music research

Our analysis revealed intriguing connections between listener characteristics and album rankings. Certain demographic groups showed distinct patterns in how their musical preferences aligned with Apple's original list.

"High-income males in either the Northeast US or the Western US are more likely to be similar to Apple's list," Ethan Budge, Data Analyst at Numerious, notes. On the flip side, some groups demonstrated significant differences from Apple's rankings. GenZ, Millennials, and lower-income individuals in the Midwest stood out as having the most notable divergence from the expert selections.

The study revealed generational trends in album preferences that, while somewhat expected, offered deeper insights into musical taste. Older listeners tended to gravitate toward classic albums, while younger generations favored more recent releases. While this pattern might seem predictable, its consistency across different music genres and time periods provides a more nuanced understanding of how age and cultural background influence musical preferences.

Genre representation and missing artists

In the survey's final question, we asked participants to suggest albums and artists they thought were missing from Apple's list. Their responses revealed eye-opening insights about musical influence.

Country music stood out as seriously underrepresented. Even more surprising were the complete absences of legendary artists like Elvis Presley and Queen—musical icons that had been overlooked entirely.

These findings didn’t just highlight gaps in the list—they showed how difficult it is to define what makes music important. Our study showcased that great music isn’t something a small panel of experts can decide for everyone. Instead, musical significance is deeply personal, shaped by different communities and individual experiences.

Implications for market research

The study does more than just list people's music preferences. It also shows how powerful advanced research techniques are for understanding what people really care about. This method goes beyond basic surveys, helping find the stories in the numbers. As Budge puts it, "these are the best tools out there to provide quantitative answers to qualitative questions."

The project highlights how advanced research methods can help companies truly understand their customers' preferences. These tools are crucial for businesses wanting to avoid costly mistakes—like launching products that miss the mark with their target audience. By identifying how different customer groups think and what they actually want, companies can make more informed decisions and create solutions that genuinely resonate.

By turning opinions into data, this method helps researchers and businesses understand complex customer preferences. It allows companies to see how tastes and opinions differ across various demographic groups, providing a clearer picture of what truly drives consumer choices.

Final thoughts

This project reveals a critical lesson for businesses: expert opinions can often miss the mark when it comes to understanding what consumers truly want. Just like Apple's music experts misread the pulse of music fans, companies across industries risk making the same mistake by relying solely on internal assumptions.

The real power lies in listening directly to your audience. Our study demonstrates that there's a scientific way to bridge the gap between expert predictions and actual customer preferences. MaxDiff analysis offers businesses a powerful tool to cut through assumptions and discover what people really care about.

Understanding your customer is the key to success. Think of their feedback as your new favorite song. When you tune in and really listen to the melody, you’ll create a chart-topping strategy that hits all the right notes for your business.

Want to see how your favorite albums rank?

Get your copy of The People's Playlist! Fill out the form below. 🎶✨